Image Durability Guidelines
1 Introduction
1.1 Objective
To develop documented, fundamental guidelines and procedures
for assessing image durability for imaging technologies including
thermal transfer, direct thermal, laser, ink jet, flexography,
lithography, photocomposition, gravure, impact printing, et al.
1.2 Methodology
The following steps should be employed as tools in creating
an evaluation procedure that is appropriate for the application
under consideration. This will help to insure that the results
can be duplicated consistently.
When defining any procedure it is important to understand that
many factors can influence the outcome. In our application some
of these factors include selection of imaging technology(equipment),
receiver selection, ribbon/ink selection, environmental conditions
(temperature, humidity), printer settings (speed, printhead energy,
printhead pressure), lapsed time between printing and conducting
durability testing (curing), and handling. It is important to
always compare like materials and to prepare samples under like
conditions. Establish a procedure that best emulates your process.
Final results should be obtained by selecting the most representative
samples obtained from multiple tests. Please note, test results
from one piece of test equipment should not be compared with results
from any other piece of test equipment.
2 Image Durability Definitions
A. Scratch Resistance: the ability of the image to withstand
repeated rubbing with a sharp or pointed object or stylus. This
test is meant to emulate the physical contact made with a contact
wand scanner, paper clip or fingernail.
B. Smudge Resistance: the ability of the image to withstand
repeated rubbing with a blunt or flat object. This test is meant
to emulate the physical contact made by a finger tip, or one corrugated
box rubbing against another.
C. Crock Resistance: the ability of the image to withstand repeated
rubbing with a cloth. This test is meant to emulate the physical
contact made by tags and labels when in contact with garments
or fabrics.
3 Image Durability Guidelines
In all of the tests below it is recommended that we use an instrument
that is widely known and used in the printing industry. Although
other testing devices were considered, the A.A.T.C.C. Crockmeter
was selected. The A.A.T.C.C. Crockmeter is a standard instrument
of the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists.
Other test equipment is sometimes specified as the standard in
some industries. The A.A.T.C.C. Crockmeter was specified because
of its availability, ease of use, low cost, consistency of results
and requirement for using specified test cloths (crock test).
This device works by subjecting an image to direct contact with
a rubbing tip or finger mounted on the end of a weighted arm.
The standard finger supplied with the unit is a 15mm diameter
solid acrylic rod. This finger rests on the image sample with
a pressure of 900g. and inscribes a straight path through the
image with each turn of the handle. The stroke length may be adjusted
to 76mm or 50mm when the test image is limited in size. The arm
is then moved repeatedly back and forth across the image in an
attempt to elicit a change in the image quality.
The Crockmeter is available in manual (hand-operated crank, model
CM-1) or motorized (model CM-5) types from Atlas Electric Devices
Company, 4114 N. Ravenswood Ave., Chicago, Illinois 60613 U.S.A.
Phone (312) 327-4520.
4 Crockmeter Test Methods: Scratch Resistance
Steps:
1. The acrylic finger supplied with the crockmeter is replaced
with another finger that has been retrofitted with a contact wand
verifier tip or suitable alternative. This device can be fashioned
in any maintenance shop using an old verifier wand tip, or a half
inch brass rod formed to the shape shown in Figure number 1. Care
should be taken to insure that this tip remains at the same height
and angle as the supplied acrylic finger.
Figure 1 - Profile of Alternative Tip for Scratch Resistance
Test and Acrylic Finger
2. The crockmeter stroke arm provided with the unit is replaced
with a light weight aluminum arm, sometimes referred to as a "Chrysler"
arm. This lightweight arm reduces the likelihood of damaging the
receiver with the sharp wand tip.
3. The test sample (typically a bar code image) is mounted on
the flat base of the instrument that is covered with abrasive
paper to prevent sliding. The sample is positioned so the image
is diagonal to the direction of travel of the stroke arm.
4. The wand tip is cleaned with rubbing alcohol before each
test to insure that there is no cross-contamination of samples.
5. The tip rests on the image sample and when the crank is turned,
a straight path is inscribed across the test sample. The number
of strokes the test sample is subjected to changes with the end
use requirements:
Standard Durability (eg. shipping label, one time use) - 10 cycles/20
strokes
Medium Durability (eg. clothing tag, limited contact use) - 100
cycles/200 strokes
High Durability (eg. shelf label, repeated contact use) - 250
cycles/500 strokes
Image Durability Rating Guidelines
Rating Scale: The rating given will be on a scale of 0-5, with
5 representing excellent and 0 being poor scratch resistance.
The grade assigned will be based on the difference in image quality,
based on ANSI letter grade obtained from a verifier capable of
evaluating print quality in compliance with ANSI X3.182- Bar
Code Print Quality Guideline, before and after the image is
subjected to contact rubbing. See Table 1 for the rating scale.
Table 1 - Rating Scale for the Scratch Test
Original ANSI Grade |
ANSI Grade
after Scratch Test |
Scratch Resistance
Grade |
A |
A |
5 |
A |
B |
4 |
A |
C |
3 |
A |
D |
2 |
A |
F |
1 |
A |
No Scan |
0 |
|
|
|
B |
B |
5 |
B |
C |
4 |
B |
D |
3 |
B |
F |
2 |
B |
No Scan |
0 |
|
|
|
C |
C |
5 |
C |
D |
4 |
C |
F |
3 |
C |
No Scan |
0 |
|
|
|
D |
D |
5 |
D |
F |
4 |
D |
No Scan |
0 |
|
|
|
F |
F |
5 |
F |
No Scan |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For images other than bar codes, a visual assessment like the
example below may be employed after conducting the contact rubbing:
Ink completely removed - text illegible
Ink completely removed - text legible
Visual scratch mark, no ink removed - text legible
No visible scratch mark - text legible
5 Crockmeter Test Methods: Smudge Resistance
Steps:
1. A clean, new 50 x 50mm square of standard crocking cloth
is mounted to the standard acrylic finger supplied with the crockmeter
using the spring clip. The standard crockmeter stroke arm is used.
2. The test sample (typically a bar code image) is mounted on
the flat base of the instrument that is covered with abrasive
paper to prevent sliding. The sample is positioned so that the
arm stroke travels diagonally across the printed image. (Since
the equipment is a fixed device, the image will need to be placed
at an angle relative to the arm stroke)
3. The covered acrylic finger rests on the sample and when the
crank is turned, a straight path is inscribed across the test
sample.
The number of strokes the test sample is subjected to changes
with the end use requirements:
Standard Durability (eg. shipping label, one time use) - 10 cycles/20
strokes
Medium Durability (eg. clothing tag, limited contact use) - 100
cycles/200 strokes
High Durability (eg. shelf label, repeated contact use) - 250
cycles/500 strokes
Image Durability Rating Guidelines
Rating Scale: The rating given will be on a scale of 0-5, with
5 representing excellent and 0 being the poor smudge resistance.
The grade assigned will be based on the difference in image quality,
based on the ANSI letter grade obtained using a verifier capable
of evaluating print quality in compliance with ANSI X3.182- Bar
Code Print Quality Guideline, before and after the image is subjected
to contact rubbing. See Table 2 for the rating scale.
6 Crockmeter Test Methods: Crock Resistance
Steps:
1. A clean, new 50 x 50mm square of standard crocking cloth
is mounted to the standard acrylic finger supplied with the crockmeter
using a spring clip. The standard crockmeter stroke are is used.
2. The test sample is mounted on the flat base of the instrument
that is covered with abrasive paper to prevent sliding. The sample
is positioned so the printed image is perpendicular to the direction
of travel of the stroke arm.
3. The covered acrylic finger rests on the sample and when the
crank is turned, a straight path is inscribed across the test
sample.
The number of strokes the test sample is subjected to changes
with the end use requirements:
o Standard Durability (eg. shipping label, one time use) - 10
cycles/20 strokes
o Medium Durability (eg. clothing tag, limited contact use) -
100 cycles/200 strokes
o High Durability (eg. shelf label, repeated contact use) - 250
cycles/500 strokes
Image Durability Rating Guidelines
Rating Scale: The rating given will be on a scale of 1-5, with
5 representing excellent and 1 being poor crock resistance. The
grade assigned will be based on a comparison to a previously established
grade scale that you have developed (See Figure 2) of the amount
of ink transferred to the crocking cloth after contact rubbing:
Amount of Ink
transferred to
Crocking Cloth* |
Crock Resistance Rating |
0 none |
5 |
0 slight/trace |
4 |
0 moderate |
3 |
0 heavy |
2 |
0 all/most |
1 |
* Control samples may be necessary to assure consistency of
results. See attached example. (See Figure 2)
Figure 2 - Typical Crockometer Limit Samples
This document is intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer,
the consumer, and the general public. The use of the document
and material contained therein is entirely voluntary. The material
presented should not be used as a substitute for user's engineering
judgement.
CAUTION: THIS GUIDELINE MAY BE REVISED OR WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME.
While a rigorous review process was followed, AIM Inc., its member
companies, and its officers assume no liability for the use of
this document.
Published by:
AIM, Inc.
634 Alpha Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15238-2802
USA
Phone: +1 412 963 8588
Fax: +1 412 963 8753
Email: [email protected]
World Wide Web: http://www.aimglobal.org
Copyright © AIM Inc. 1996
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced
in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without
the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.
It is the intent and understanding of AIM Inc. that the information
presented in this guideline is entirely in the public domain and
free of all use restrictions, licenses and fees.
May 1996
Reprinted with permission from AIM, Inc.
www.aimglobal.org
Back
to index