Shipping System Brings Bar Code Benefits To J&J
At Johnson & Johnson, scanning boosts inventory
and
shipping accuracy.
As conglomerates go, Johnson & Johnson is surely one of
the biggest and best-known: It supports 160 companies in 50 countries
worldwide and is the world's largest and most comprehensive manufacturer
of health care products serving consumer, pharmaceutical, and
professional markets, with annual revenues of $15.7 billion.
One of those companies, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products,
Inc., is located in Royston, Georgia, where (according to Information
Technology Consultant Dwight Medders) the baseball great Ty Cobb
overlooks the 260,000 square-foot plant and its 300 employees
from his final resting place. The Royston plant manufactures such
familiar household products as JOHNSON'S Baby Powder, SHOWER TO
SHOWER Body Powder, and JOHNSON'S HEALTHFLOW Baby Bottles.
Like all major manufacturers for the retail trade, Johnson &
Johnson has been labeling products according to U.P.C./EAN standards
for 18 years, but using bar codes for internal processes is a
more recent development. About two years ago the company moved,
incrementally, to automated data capture in finished goods and
then in shipping. Johnson & Johnson has been putting U.P.C.
shipping labels on cartons to meet retail customers' requirements
since 1988, and the first inventory-tracking application was implemented
to scan these bar codes already in place.
"Originally we were doing direct key entry of summary data
on furnished goods into our MFG Pro MRP system," Mr. Medders
said. "Of course, that caused a number of problems: People
would batch the data to the system [resident on a DEC VAX 4500]
and sometimes enter it a full day later, so inventories weren't
up to date. Also the user interface was not friendly, causing
errors in quantities, codes, and routings.
"We had the bar code shipping label for the retail trade
on the cartons, so we decided to scan cases with a fixed-mount
scanner as they came down the line from production," Mr.
Medders explained. "Trouble was, we had a high percentage
of scan errors as well as other errors; for example, the scanner
would count damaged packages that we didn't ship.
"About a year and a half ago, we switched to handheld scanners.
The first handheld we tried couldn't read the carton labels' two
bar codes, which were in 14-digit U.P.C. code separated with a
barrier bar from our own four-digit, Interleaved 2 of 5 product-modification
code. The scanner couldn't read the second bar code, which we
used for product revisions," Mr. Medders said.
"We needed a programmable scanner with a keyboard and screen,
so we contacted Compsee, a systems integrator in Mt. Gilead, North
Carolina," he continued. "They recommended the Mars
MEQ 530 LR laser scanner/terminal, which we hardwired directly
into the VAX. Working with Compsee, we programmed it with BASIC
to recognize both bar codes on the carton, along with some user
functionality -things like a menuing system, the ability to deal
with nonstandard pallet quantities, a scanner-status option, and
built-in intelligence to make sure the [Zebra Z105 thermal transfer]printer
was on-line."
How it Works
DEC consultants developed a data collection program that would
interface with the MFG Pro MRP system on the VAX. The program
tracked finished-goods inventory and printed a pallet label encoding
(in Code 128) the product code, quantity, unit of measure, manufacturing
site, date of manufacture, lot number, and a serialized pallet
number.
"Keeping the data collection program separate allows it
to scan and collect data while database backups and other maintenance
on the VAX is going on," Mr. Medders said. "This proved
important because early this year corporate headquarters centralized
our computers in New Jersey. We didn't want to trust critical
communications over 1000 miles, so we put the application on our
own VAX 4000-60 workstation. Now we communicate in homegrown client/server
mode, where our VAX workstation collects the data and updates
the MRP program on the VAX in New Jersey." Updates come in
periodic intervals that vary by production line from direct transactions
to four-hour updates, he added.
Linda Hill, another IT consultant, designed the Royston system.
"When a pallet comes off the end of each production line,
operators scan one of the cartons on the pallet, and the system
translates the U.P.C. shipping code into our part number, which
triggers two transactions," Ms. Hill said. "The Zebra
prints a pallet tag encoding the whole pallet quantity, updates
inventory on the MRP system, and at the same time creates a bar
code pallet file, which is integrated into a separate product
release and shipping system."
Nonstandard pallets are common, Ms. Hill explained, because
it's a company policy not to mix lots or date codes. "For
nonstandard pallets at the end of the day, or a run," shed
said, "the operator key-enters the quantity on the MEQ keyboard,
then scans the carton code."
"At shipping, we only scan the serialized number on the
pallet," Mr. Medders said. "The data associated with
that number is held in a separate product release system that
allows us to trace finished goods by product code, lot number,
truck, and destination. Essentially, we scan the pallets as we
load them into trucks, using Symbol LS3000 scanners. This local
database also updates the MRP system periodically-anywhere between
ten minutes and four hours. But production personnel also have
the ability to flush the transactions through if anyone needs
the data immediately, to do a cycle count, for example."
"When the pallet tag is scanned," Ms. Hill added,
"the system flags that the pallet has been shipped and attached
it to a trailer number and other relevant data. Impounded product,
for example, can't be unloaded until the release date. Our distribution
centers are also interfaced to the MRP and product-release systems,
giving them access to this data."
Visible Benefits
Johnson & Johnson hasn't quantified the benefits of the
automated system, but Mr. Medders pointed out that savings are
considerable. "The new system was critical in eliminating
clerical help, and we've substantially increased data accuracy.
We have more accurate and timely inventory data, and finished-good
lot traceability in voluntary compliance with corporate and regulatory
requirements," he said.
Ms. Hill added that the visibility of product in shipping wouldn't
be possible without automated data collection, and they've also
eliminated quite a bit of paperwork because shipping operators
no longer need to fax documents. Currently one plant is using
the system, but the company has active projects to automate finished
goods in two more. "We've been very pleased with it,"
Mr. Medders concluded. "Today, we often ship finished goods
within 30 minutes of production. This wouldn't have been possible
without bar coding."
Reprinted from:
ID Systems
Helmers Publishing, Inc
December 1995